To the OP:
The committee regrets to inform you that you won't be winning the "Miss Congeniality" award. All seriousness aside, I hope you are receptive to some solid information.
From your very first response, you have repeatedly insulted me, talked down to me and treated me as an ignorant antagonist.
How exactly does me requesting scientific evidence to backup a claim make me a creationist?
And I should point out, you still haven't provided any actual evidence, just a narrative. Maybe that narrative is 100% accurate, maybe it isn't. That's what I was trying to find out in the first place before you railroaded my thread.
From hundreds/thousands of observations theory starts to emerge.
That's not even remotely how science works. Anecdotal evidence plus more anecdotal evidence never equals a legitimate scientific theory.
That would require some sort of controlled trial, which is what I wanted information on in the first place.
Too bad a "creationist" has to explain this to you.
All seriousness aside, you are an arrogant, patronizing jerk, and I expected better from this site's reputation.