Ok well, I'm gonna put my modesty aside for a sec...
I rarely base my ''opinion'' on nothing but researched info, personally tested facts and most of the time, even more questioning. I've always encouraged people to correct me, if you haven't noticed in several of my messages I often say it.
I do think I have a relatively unique perspective to offer. Not many clients know what permanent AND temporary reactions can look like (I've experienced both!). Also, not many are willing, or have done as many little tests as I have, that has to count for at least something. I might not possess the technical knowledge that some people here have, however I believe that I've got some of the practical aspects established (and there's always room to grow).
Not even talking about the zapping here, when did I ever give ''advice'' on zapping anyway? I wouldn't even dare to.
Everything I've said thus far on this forum was to get myself (and maybe others) rid of misconceptions and to be one step nearer from the truth.
Doesnt seem to me you're particularly receptive to what you are being told
WHERE? I literally adapt everything (tests, assumptions, knowledge) from what people are telling me.
Again, WHERE WAS I WRONG? I'd love to know!
I don't see you discouraging people spilling their hearsay here so I'm wondering... why me?