Cool.

What is this P and G thing you are talking about?
Can't find anything on google

Wich would be better, Rio or the Tria?

Btw the LD20k has 20mm not 2mm.
And is (atleast stated) to be stronger then the Tria.

Better for what? You need to decide what type of results you are ok with, i.e. temporary (2 days, 4 weeks, 6 weeks hairfree?), permanent?

Temporary (more then 4 weeks) is fine with me.
I've heard the Ria does NOT work and that it is as worthless as the LD20K
Compared to the Tria that is just temporary?

You can achieve this with waxing. That would be cheapest. Tria costs around $1K to give you long-term temporary reduction.

How are you supposed to get everything done when you need to stop and charge it every 21 minutes?

12 hours to do the bottom of 1 leg, which means approx 24 hours (A WHOLE DAY) to do the bottom of your legs properly.

Also the machine only lasts for 250 charges.

it doesn't sound very convincing.

Bingo!

Is that the Tria that you are talking about? I cant find any reference to that statement in my instruction manual.
I was going to post my experience after two weeks as I acutally HAVE the device but I dont think I would be believed.

IF you take pictures you would be.

It's not that you wouldn't be belived, it's simply that we would askq uestions in regards to the treatment. For example, have you waited 3 months since your last treatment to assess the hair? What area and so forth?

If everything added up and you said that there had definatley been a decrease in the amount of hair, who are we to argue?

But yes, piccies would be nice

Regards,
Benji