This illustrates why continuing education and more controlled studies are important in all fields of work. As I said, Richard’s and Meharg’s book is a wee outdated in regard to some of the information as it was known in 1997, but they have done a great job trying to fairly correct some information.
In the second edition supplement on S2 in Chapter S1, this very subject is mentioned under, “Update on Our Recommendations Concerning the Relative Efficiencies of Thermolysis and The Blend”. In short, they are less ridgid in their position about blend being the prefered method of choice and have acknowledged that others, like Dr.James Shuster and Dr. William Danby who have studied all modalities, have concluded that all methods can give good results. Basically, Thermolysis is more difficult to use while The Blend leaves more room for operator error. They concluded that excellent and PERMANENT results can be obtained with thermolysis, with or without using an insulated probe. They like the computerized epilators for blend or thermolysis. So do I.
Your electrologist may only be comfortable with one modality because she knows how to do it well. No problem there. However, It is not right to poo-poo another modality that works with high capacity, especially if you, the consumer, desires getting the hair off fast and with as much “comfort” as possible.
If she can do microflash with her epilator, make perfect insertions or at least near perfect insertions 99% of the time, and use the correct probe size, she can give you the gift of permanent hair removal, using thermolysis, in all it’s glory and variation.
So, tip off your practitioner to pick up the 2nd edition of, “Cosmetic and Medical Electrolysis & Temporary Hair Removal” by Richards and Meharg, go to the supplement in the back of the book, page S2 and S3. Look for (Section B page 13) and it’s all there for her to read. I was taught all this good stuff about Blend when I went to school and actually started out as a blend electrologist for the first couple of years. I wasn’t lied to, but what is true today about thermolysis was not true back then. Computerized epilators with specific modes, insulated probes and special techniques have lifted thermolysis from a limited modality to a super star. Now, I have flipped from being a blender to being a picoflasher. There are no excuses for electrologists not knowing the good news about thermolysis in 2008. It’s all there for anyone to know and use. So, what you have read on this site is exactly correct, thermolysis is equally as effective as blend for those that apply it correctly with a modern, computerized epilator using the proper type of probe. Please tell your electrologist the good news and hopefully she will become curious make a move.
Dee